Saturday 26 December 2020

GABS Megacorp Ltd. Vs Sutanu Sinha and Anr - Exclusion of the period of Judicial Intervention during Liquidation Process

 NCLAT (21.12.2020) in GABS Megacorp Ltd. Vs Sutanu Sinha and Anr. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1026 & 1027 of 2020] held that;

  • It is manifestly evident that prayer in regard to extension of time sought by the Appellant remains uncontested as the ‘Lenders and Stakeholders Committee’ have expressed their interest in getting the sale of the Corporate Debtor, in favour of the Appellant, completed at the earliest. It would be conducive to the interest of justice that period during which the Appellant had been agitating before the judicial apparatus for waiver of interest to achieve the desired objective of completing the sale of Corporate Debtor, is excluded.

  • Having regard to the fact that the Lenders and Stakeholders Committee have approved the waiver of interest by 91.59% voting and there is justification for allowing exclusion of the period of judicial intervention, we allow exclusion of 271 days w.e.f. 25th March, 2020 till today,


Excerpts of the order;

21.12.2020: Counter affidavit filed by Respondent No. 1 is taken on record.


# 2. Heard Shri Virendra Ganda, learned senior counsel representing the Appellant and Shri Nirav Shah, learned counsel representing the Respondents.


# 3. The issue raised in this appeal relates to extension of time. According to the Appellant, though time has been extended in terms of the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Hyderabad Bench, time taken in prosecution of application seeking extension has not been taken care of. Thus, it is contended that the exercise has not yielded the expected benefit.


# 4. After going through the counter affidavit filed by Respondent No. 1, it emerges that the ‘Lenders and Stakeholders Committee’ has approved the waiver of interest. Reference in this regard is made to Annexure 6 and Annexure 7 of the Counter Affidavit at pages 47 and 48 respectively. It is manifestly evident that prayer in regard to extension of time sought by the Appellant remains uncontested as the ‘Lenders and Stakeholders Committee’ have expressed their interest in getting the sale of the Corporate Debtor, in favour of the Appellant, completed at the earliest. It would be conducive to the interest of justice that period during which the Appellant had been agitating before the judicial apparatus for waiver of interest to achieve the desired objective of completing the sale of Corporate Debtor, is excluded. From the minutes recorded on 8th December, 2020 (page 44 to 46 of the counter affidavit), it comes to fore that the 90 days period in terms of Regulation 44 has came to an end on 3rd December, 2020 whereas the Appellant has not deposited any payment by 30th November, 2020 and the voting lines had been extended till 3rd December, 2020. Thereafter, the matter was heard by this Appellate tribunal and order directing status quo came to be passed, which is to expire today. The period sought to be excluded in terms of Regulation 47A has been worked out at page 45 in a tabular form which is reproduced herein Below:-  ………….


# 5. According to this calculation the period required to be excluded is from 25th March, 2020 until today, that is the period of judicial intervention, which has been calculated at 271 days and once this exclusion is permitted, the date of liquidation process to be completed would be 22nd July, 2021. Having regard to the fact that the Lenders and Stakeholders Committee have approved the waiver of interest by 91.59% voting and there is justification for allowing exclusion of the period of judicial intervention, we allow exclusion of 271 days w.e.f. 25th March, 2020 till today, culminating in extending the liquidation process until 22nd July, 2021. Since the notice period would commence from tomorrow, i.e. 22nd December, 2020, the entire amount of Rs.1654.77 Crores minus whatever advance payment has been made shall be paid by the Appellant/Purchaser within a period of 90 days reckoned from 22nd December, 2020. It is being expressly made clear that in the event of such payment being made by the Appellant/Purchaser within 30 days beginning from 22nd December, 2020 no interest will be charged thereon. But in the event of payment being made beyond 30 days but within 90 days, interest will be chargeable as per IBBI Regulations. Appeal is allowed with aforesaid observations and directions.


-----------------------------------


No comments:

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

The sole purpose of this post is to create awareness on the "IBC - Case Law" and to provide synopsis of the concerned case law, must not be used as a guide for taking or recommending any action or decision. A reader must refer to the full citation of the order & do one's own research and seek professional advice if he intends to take any action or decision in the matters covered in this post.

Mr. Vijendra Kumar Jain Vs Mr. Nitin Ramchandra Jadhav and Ors.. - Thus, by taking a cue from the judgments rendered by the English Courts in this regard, the following acts have been held to constitute ‘Wrongful Trading’;

NCLT Mumbai-V (2024.05.07) in Mr. Vijendra Kumar Jain Vs Mr. Nitin Ramchandra Jadhav and Ors..[ (2024) ibclaw.in 515 NCLT, I.A. 677 of 2023...