Wednesday 16 December 2020

Newogrowth Credit Pvt. Ltd. Vs.Resolution Professional, Bhaskar Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. - A CoC member is to bear his share of CIRP cost

NCLAT (10.12.2020) in Newogrowth Credit Pvt. Ltd.Vs.Resolution Professional, Bhaskar Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.[Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1053 of 2020] held that; a CoC  member is to bear his share of CIRP cost in proportion of his voting share and the period, he was a member of the CoC. 

Excerpts of the order;

10.12.2020: This appeal has been preferred by ‘Newogrowth Credit Pvt. Ltd.’, a member of the Committee of Creditors assailing the impugned order dated 12th October, 2020 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Special Bench, Court VI in IA No. 2357 of 2020 in CP (IB) NO. 2832/ND/2019 by virtue whereof the Appellant has been directed to bear 27% of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) costs as per its share. The order is assailed on the ground that the Appellant had withdrawn its claim and such withdrawal had been permitted by the Resolution Professional. Reference in this regard is made to Annexure A7 at page 78 of the appeal paper book. However, Mr. Nipun Gautam, Advocate representing the Resolution Professional submits that the decision of the Resolution Professional allowing withdrawal of claim was subsequently set aside by the Adjudicating Authority which directed inclusion of the Appellant in the Committee of Creditors and the Appellant did actually and factually participate in the meeting of the Committee of Creditors.


# 2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we find that the direction in terms of the impugned order slapping Appellant with liability to bear 27% of the CIRP cost is backed by the documentary evidence besides being in consonance with and proportionate to the share of the Appellant. Therefore, the contention of same being arbitrary or unreasonable cannot be entertained. However, it appears that the computation of the cost has not taken into consideration the period of exclusion of Appellant from the CIRP viz. the period from 5th February, 2020 (when its claim was allowed to be withdrawn) to 10th July, 2020 (when it was a part of the Committee of Creditors). The CIRP costs for such period have to be excluded as the Appellant cannot be held in any manner liable to bear the same. After such exclusion, learned counsel at the Bar agreed that the amount comes to Rs.1,16,000/- which is due and payable.


# 3. We accordingly modify the impugned order to the extent indicated hereinabove. The Appellant shall pay the amount of Rs.1,16,000/- as share of its CIRP costs within 10 days. The appeal is accordingly disposed off.


------------------------------


No comments:

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

The sole purpose of this post is to create awareness on the "IBC - Case Law" and to provide synopsis of the concerned case law, must not be used as a guide for taking or recommending any action or decision. A reader must refer to the full citation of the order & do one's own research and seek professional advice if he intends to take any action or decision in the matters covered in this post.

Imp. Rulings;- Wrongful Trading [Section 66(2)] of IBC.

  Imp. Rulings;-  Wrongful Trading [Section 66(2)] of IBC. Index; NCLT Mumbai-V (2024.05.07) in Mr. Vijendra Kumar Jain Vs Mr. Nitin Ramchan...