Friday, 22 January 2021

Punjab National Bank Vs Mr. Kiran Shah, Liquidator of ORG Informatics Ltd. - CoC cannot move an application for removal of Liquidator in absence of any provisions under the law

NCLAT (21.01.2020) in Punjab National Bank Vs Mr. Kiran Shah Liquidator of ORG Informatics Ltd. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 102 of 2020]  held that; 

  • The grievance of the Appellant is that he is against the appointment of the Liquidator. However, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order as after the liquidation the ‘Committee of Creditors’ has no role to play and they are simply a claimant whose matters are to be determined by the Liquidator and cannot move an application for removal of Liquidator in absence of any provisions under the law.


Excerpts of the order;

21.01.2020─ In the ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ of ‘M/s. ORG Informatics Limited’- (‘Corporate Debtor’), the ‘Committee of Creditors’ of which the ‘Punjab National Bank’ is the lead Bank, decided to move application for liquidation of the ‘Corporate Debtor’.


# 2. The ‘Resolution Professional’ was asked to move an application for liquidation under Sections 33 & 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The said application has been accepted by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad by impugned order dated 20th November, 2019. The ‘Resolution Professional’ has been asked to continue as Liquidator.


# 3. The grievance of the Appellant is that he is against the appointment of the Liquidator. However, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order as after the liquidation the ‘Committee of Creditors’ has no role to play and they are simply a claimant whose matters are to be determined by the Liquidator and cannot move an application for removal of Liquidator in absence of any provisions under the law.


We find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. No costs.


-----------------------------------------------------------------


No comments:

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

The sole purpose of this post is to create awareness on the "IBC - Case Law" and to provide synopsis of the concerned case law, must not be used as a guide for taking or recommending any action or decision. A reader must refer to the full citation of the order & do one's own research and seek professional advice if he intends to take any action or decision in the matters covered in this post.